1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 149 F.Supp.2d
  5. 149 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2001)
 

U.S. v. ACOSTA

No. 98-CR-0104.

149 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Andrew ACOSTA,, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

June 22, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karine Moreno-Taxman, United States Dept. of Justice, (ED-WI), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff.

Patrick W. Blegen, Chicago, IL, John A. Cabranes, Hartig Bjelajac Cabranes & Koenen, Racine, WI, Dianne M. Erickson, Wasielewski & Erickson, Milwaukee, WI, Dale P. Nikolay, Gregory R. Parr, Milwaukee, WI, Matt J. Ricci, Ricci Law Offices, Wilwaukee, WI, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

ADELMAN, District Judge.

In the trial of this criminal case I used a verdict form in which special interrogatories on all elements of the crime preceded a question on guilt or innocence. The verdict form for one defendant, Andrew Acosta, is attached as Appendix A to this Memorandum as an example; three other defendants had similar verdict forms. My reasons for using this verdict form appear in the transcript, but I thought I would put them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases