1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 195 F.Supp.2d
  5. 195 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2001)
 

INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS v. A2Z MOBILE OFFICE

No. C-1-99-731.

195 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2001)

INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. A2Z MOBILE OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

April 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Helbling, Cincinnati, OH, Mark F. Smith, Eric W. Guttag, Mason, OH, for Plaintiff.

Charles Hartley Melville, Cincinnati, OH, Thomas P. Liniak, Liniak, Berenato, Longacre & White, Bethesda, MD, for Defendants.

Joseph P. Mehrle, David Liles, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, James, for Mobile Office Enterprise.

ORDER

BECKWITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Brian Lee and a2z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc. (Doc. No. 28) and Defendants Douglas Mayer and Mobile Office Enterprise, Inc. (Doc. No. 29). For the reasons set forth below, both motions for summary judgment are GRANTED IN PART AND MOOT IN PART.

I. Background

The dispute in this case stakes out the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases