1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 26 P.3d
  5. 26 P.3d 1190 (2001)
 

BANALES v. SMITH

No. 2 CA-CV 00-0169.

26 P.3d 1190 (2001)

200 Ariz. 419

Daniel J. BANALES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Keri SMITH, nka Keri Robinson, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

July 19, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily Danies, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C., by Erika L. Cossitt, Patricia Ann Green, Tucson, for defendant/appellee.

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Daniel Banales, appeals from the trial court's decree granting appellee, Keri Robinson, custody of their daughter and visitation rights to Daniel. Daniel argues the trial court erred by failing to consider a necessary child custody factor and make an express finding on it as required by A.R.S. § 25-403.1 Because Daniel failed to object in the trial court, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases