Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Contrary to defendant's contention, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not illegal. Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) based on his possession of a "dangerous or deadly instrument or weapon with intent to use the same unlawfully against another" (Penal Law § 265.01 [2]) and his previous conviction "of any crime" (Penal Law §...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.