MBL ASSOCIATES v. SOUTH BURLINGTON

Nos. 00-073, 00-074.

776 A.2d 432 (2001)

MBL ASSOCIATES v. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Larkin-Milot Partnership v. City of South Burlington.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 29, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis R. Pearson and Stephen R. Crampton of Gravel and Shea, Burlington, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Robert E. Fletcher and Joseph S. McLean of Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.


SKOGLUND, J.

In these consolidated appeals, the City of South Burlington challenges related judgments of the superior court in favor of plaintiffs MBL Associates and the Larkin-Milot Partnership. The City contends the court erred in concluding that plaintiffs were exempt from the City's recreation impact-fee ordinance. We affirm.

The material facts are undisputed. In 1993, the City's planning commission gave final subdivision map approval to Larkin-Milot's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases