1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 283 A.D.2d
  5. 283 A.D.2d 920 (2001)
 

MATTER OF BURDICK

283 A.D.2d 920 (2001)

723 N.Y.S.2d 918

In the Matter of the Estate of DANIEL F. BURDICK, Deceased. D. LAWRENCE BURDICK, Respondent; JANE B. MALLOY et al., as Coexecutrices of DANIEL F. BURDICK, Deceased, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided May 2, 2001.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Although Surrogate's Court properly determined that respondents' attorneys are disqualified, the court erred in determining that they are disqualified pursuant to subdivision (b) of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102 (22 NYCRR 1200.21). The proper subdivision pursuant to which they are disqualified is subdivision (c). We have examined respondents' remaining contentions and conclude that they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases