1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 14 (2001)
 

KACZOROWSKI v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

No. A091318.

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 14 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 564

Mary Rose KACZOROWSKI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MENDOCINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendant and Respondent; Don Perry et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

April 17, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel for Appellant: Mary Rose Kaczorowski, in pro. per.

Counsel for Respondent: H. Peter Klein, County Counsel, Frank Zotter, Jr., Chief Deputy.

Counsel for Real Parties in Interest: Richard J. Henderson, Ukiah, Mannon and King, James King, Ukiah.

KAY, J.

In some situations a proposed project approved by a local governmental entity subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)1 may be appealed to the California Coastal Commission (Commission). The question presented by this appeal is whether, when such an appeal is taken to the Commission and it is the Commission which, after conducting a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases