1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 629 N.W.2d
  5. 629 N.W.2d 558 (2001)
 

HEESACKER v. HEESACKER

No. S-00-309.

629 N.W.2d 558 (2001)

262 Neb. 179

James H. HEESACKER, Appellant, v. Twila D. HEESACKER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

July 13, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Pistillo and Mark A. Steele, Omaha, of Pistillo & Pistillo, P.C., for appellant.

Ronald E. Frank, Omaha, and Kelly K. Brandon, Bellevue, of Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, for appellee.

HENDRY, C.J., and WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.

CONNOLLY, Justice.

James H. Heesacker appeals from a decree of dissolution. The only issue on appeal is James' child support obligation. The district court used the sole custody worksheet instead of the joint custody worksheet to determine James' child support obligation. We determine that James' liberal visitation schedule was not a joint physical custody arrangement. Accordingly, the trial court's use of the sole custody worksheet was correct. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases