Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The verdict finding defendant guilty of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [2]) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence, and the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.