1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 146 F.Supp.2d
  5. 146 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2001)
 

AMERICAN GREYHOUND RACING, INC. v. HULL

No. CIV. 00-2388-PHX-RCB.

146 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2001)

AMERICAN GREYHOUND RACING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, and Tucson Greyhound Park, Inc., Plaintiff in Intervention, v. Jane Dee HULL, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

July 3, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Vincent Wake, Linda Delmor Skon, Law Offices of Neil Vincent, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs.

W. Scott Bales, Thomas John Dennis, Atty. Gens. Office, Phoenix, AZ, Richard Wingfield Garnett, III, Maricopa County Atty's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants.

Donald M. Peters, Timothy Andrew LaSota, Miller, LaSota & Peters, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Intervenor Plaintiff.

ORDER, AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BROOMFIELD, Senior District Judge.

This is a case with potentially serious implications for the future of gaming in Arizona. A synopsis of the court's decision can be found beginning on page 1029.

The Plaintiffs are permittees of horse and dog racing facilities in Arizona. Am. Compl. (doc. # 45) ¶¶ 1-2. The Plaintiff-Intervenor Tucson Greyhound Park, Inc., is a permittee for a dog racing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases