1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 166 F.Supp.2d
  5. 166 F.Supp.2d 984 (2001)
 

BP AMOCO CHEMICAL CO. v. SUN OIL CO.

No. 00-082-RRM.

166 F.Supp.2d 984 (2001)

BP AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUN OIL COMPANY, FMC Corporation, and Claymont Investment Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

September 17, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Maron, Esquire, Thomas C. Martin, Esquire, and John P. Daniello, Esquire, Maron & Marvel, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; counsel for plaintiff.

David J. Baldwin, Esquire, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Harold L. Segall, Esquire and David M. Williamson, Esquire, Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., Washington D.C.; counsel for defendant Sunoco, Inc., successor to Sun Oil Company, and Claymont Investment Company.

Thomas S. Neuberger, Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware; counsel for defendant FMC Corporation.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This lawsuit concerns the apportionment of environmental liabilities. Plaintiff, BP Amoco Chemical Company, is a Delaware corporation. Defendants, Sun Oil Company and FMC Corporation, are Delaware corporations. Defendant, Claymont Investment Corporation, at all times relevant to this action, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Sun.

On February 9, 2000, BP Amoco filed its complaint in this action against Sun, Claymont...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases