Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination which found him guilty of committing an unhygienic act on the ground that his disciplinary hearing was not timely commenced. Supreme Court denied the application and we affirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the delay in commencement of the hearing was authorized by a valid extension indicating that the hearing was to be completed within 13 days after his release from confinement for mental...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.