1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 27 P.3d
  5. 27 P.3d 1100 (2001)
 

VILLANUEVA v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAM'RS

97-09; A108093.

27 P.3d 1100 (2001)

175 Or. App. 345

Michael R. VILLANUEVA, PhD., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Farnell, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Hagen, Dye, Hirschy & DiLorenzo.

Denise Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

The Board of Psychologist Examiners reprimanded petitioner and fined him $1,000 for treating a minor child without the custodial parent's consent. The Board concluded that petitioner's conduct violated the American Psychological Association's (APA) Ethical Principle 4.02.1 On review, petitioner argues that the Board's notice of proposed disciplinary action failed to comply with ORS 183.415(2)(c) because it did not allege that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases