1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 16 P.3d
  5. 16 P.3d 1074 (2001)
 

PRO-MAX CORP. v. FEENSTRA

No. 30774.

16 P.3d 1074 (2001)

PRO-MAX CORPORATION, A Nevada Corporation, Appellant, v. Peter FEENSTRA, Shirley Feenstra, and Jack A. Ferguson, Respondents. Jack A. Ferguson, Appellant, v. Mary Ann Ferguson and Pro-Max Corporation, A Nevada Corporation; and Wesley D. Adams, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

January 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low, Reno; Newsom, Giffen & Marne, San Rafael, California, for Appellant/Respondent Pro-Max Corporation and Respondent Mary Ann Ferguson.

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg, Reno, for Respondent/Appellant Jack A. Ferguson and Respondents Peter Feenstra and Shirley Feenstra.

Simon & Berman, Las Vegas, for Respondent Wesley D. Adams.

BEFORE YOUNG, AGOSTI and LEAVITT, JJ.

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

On September 15, 2000, this court issued an opinion in this appeal. Respondents Jack A. Ferguson, Peter Feenstra and Shirley Feenstra timely petitioned for rehearing. In light of the rehearing petition, we withdrew our September 15, 2000, opinion. We now conclude that rehearing is warranted and therefore grant the petition and issue this opinion in place of our previously withdrawn opinion.

The primary issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases