STATE v. DIMOCK

99P-3215; A109763

27 P.3d 1048 (2001)

174 Or. App. 500

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Donald Edward DIMOCK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 6, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph E. Penna, Monmourth, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Kaye E. McDonald argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Salem, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


KISTLER, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for encouraging child sex abuse. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his demurrer, arguing that the statute under which he was convicted violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We affirm.

Defendant left his personal computer at a repair shop to have it fixed. While working on the computer, a repair shop employee discovered that the hard drive contained downloaded pictures of minor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases