1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 135 F.Supp.2d
  5. 135 F.Supp.2d 917 (2001)
 

U.S. v. ESTERMAN

No. 00 CR 319.

135 F.Supp.2d 917 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gary ESTERMAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott R. Lassar, United States Attorney, Patrick J. King, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, John L. Burley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

George B. Collins, Gregory A. Bedell, Collins & Bargione, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Following a jury trial in which Gary Esterman ("Esterman") was found guilty of each offense charged in a multi-count indictment, Esterman's counsel has attacked the jury's Special Verdict Forfeiture Form on the ground that Esterman's criminal conduct did not "affect[] a financial institution," as required for forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A).1 Both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases