Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At trial, a police officer testified about certain statements he had elicited from the defendant. The officer also testified that, prior to obtaining such statements, he had spoken to two other individuals concerning the facts of the case. The defendant argues that he was deprived of his right to confront the witnesses against him, since the two individuals with whom the officer had spoken were not present at trial. We agree...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.