1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 772 A.2d
  5. 772 A.2d 267 (2001)
 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. OSWINKLE

Misc. AG No. 3, Sept. Term, 2000.

772 A.2d 267 (2001)

364 Md. 182

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. George Milton OSWINKLE.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel for the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, for petitioner.

Andrew Jay Graham, of Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and LAWRENCE F. RODOWSKY, (retired, specially assigned) JJ.

RAKER, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, through Bar Counsel, charged Respondent, George Milton Oswinkle, with violating Rule 8.1 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.1 Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(b), we referred the charge to Judge M. Brooke Murdock of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing, the hearing judge concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases