1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 777 A.2d
  5. 777 A.2d 259 (2001)
 

IN RE SCHOENEMAN

No. 99-BG-477.

777 A.2d 259 (2001)

In re Charles W. SCHOENEMAN, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Webster, Washington, for respondent.

Michael S. Frisch, Senior Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Joyce E. Peters, Bar Counsel, was on the brief, for Bar Counsel.

Before SCHWELB and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

After a complaint was filed with the Virginia State Bar alleging that Charles Schoeneman had neglected a case and failed to keep his client informed of its progress, Schoeneman chose not to contest the allegation, and surrendered his license to practice law in Virginia. Because a resignation in the face of pending charges of misconduct is a form of bar discipline, see In re Day, 717 A.2d 883, 888 (D.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases