1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 144 F.Supp.2d
  5. 144 F.Supp.2d 892 (2001)
 

U.S. v. BOST

No. 1:99-CR-155.

144 F.Supp.2d 892 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence BOST, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

April 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Bost, Kalamazoo, MI, pro se.

Cornelius Pitts, Cornelius Pitts Law Offices, Detroit, MI, William D. Hunter, William D. Hunter Law Offices, Detroit, MI, Richard Rosenberg, Royal Oak, MI, John F. Royal, Detroit, MI, for Lawrence Bost, defendant.

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

Defendant Lawrence has moved for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 and for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29. For the reasons which follow, the Court determines that the motions should be denied without an evidentiary hearing since the reasons for denial are clear from the trial record and the motion filings of the parties. See United States v. Nace, 561 F.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases