WALSER AUTO SALES v. CITY OF RICHFIELD

No. C4-01-694.

635 N.W.2d 391 (2001)

WALSER AUTO SALES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHFIELD, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley J. Gunn, Leonard, Street & Deinard; and Bruce D. Malkerson, Malkerson Gilliland & Martin, LLP, Minneapolis, for appellants.

John M. LeFevre, Jr., Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Susan L. Naughton, League of Minnesota Cities, Minnesota NAHRO, St. Paul, for amicus curiae.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and AMUNDSON, Judge.


OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellants challenge the use of tax-increment financing to fund a redevelopment project. After a court trial, the district court dismissed appellants' complaint and awarded respondents attorney fees. On appeal, appellants allege that the project is defective because (a) the primary beneficiary of the project is a private interest; (b) respondents failed to make adequate efforts to inspect the properties deemed substandard; (c) the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases