Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that an explanatory comment by the Supreme Court as to why an adjournment was required constituted reversible error is without merit. The comment was made immediately subsequent to opening arguments. As neither the complainant nor any other witness had testified, there was no testimony to believe or disbelieve, and the Supreme Court's comment did not indicate that it credited the complainant in any...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.