1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 94 F.Supp.2d
  5. 94 F.Supp.2d 878 (2000)
 

McDANIEL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. 5:99-CV-2761.

94 F.Supp.2d 878 (2000)

Arthur MCDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

May 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Van Gaasbeek, North Canton, OH, for Arthur McDaniel, Plaintiffs.

Bradley A Sherman, Duvin, Cahn & Hutton, Cleveland, OH, Gregory S Muzingo, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Legal Department, Bentonville, AR, Richard C Hubbard, III, Duvin, Cahn & Hutton, Cleveland, OH, for Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On April 24, 2000, Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart") filed a motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Arthur McDaniel's employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII") [Doc. 16]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Wal-Mart's motion.

I.

The present action arises from Plaintiff McDaniel's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases