1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 103 F.Supp.2d
  5. 103 F.Supp.2d 847 (2000)
 

INOFAST MFG., INC. v. BARDSLEY

No. CIV. A. 99-CV-6341.

103 F.Supp.2d 847 (2000)

INOFAST MANUFACTURING, INC. and Norman Bardsley, v. Scott BARDSLEY, Leigh Bardsley, and Dave Miller.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Bardsley, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Jonathan K. Hollin, Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle, Bowman and Lombardo, King of Prussia, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This case has been brought before the Court on motion of the defendants to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations and by the principles of res judicata. For the reasons set forth in the paragraphs which follow, the motion shall be granted and Plaintiff's complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases