PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the denial of his 3.850 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The appellant argues that he was not given written notice, either at the time of or prior to the entry of his plea, of the state's intent to seek habitual offender status. The state concedes and we agree that the trial judge erred in not conducting an evidentiary hearing because the record does not conclusively refute the appellant's claim.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
