1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 99 F.Supp.2d
  5. 99 F.Supp.2d 837 (2000)
 

HARRIS v. FITCHVILLE TP. TRUSTEES

No. 3:99CV7789.

99 F.Supp.2d 837 (2000)

Robert A. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiff, v. FITCHVILLE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

May 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reese M. Wineman, Norwalk, OH, for plaintiffs.

Joan C. Szuberla, B. Gary McBride, Spengler & Nathanson, Toledo, Daivia S. Kasper, Office of Prosecuting Attorney, Norwalk, OH, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on Defendants' objections to the February 25, 2000 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate. In accordance with Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208 (6th Cir.1981), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C), this Court has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate's findings to which the Defendants object....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases