1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 117 F.Supp.2d
  5. 117 F.Supp.2d 812 (2000)
 

EATON v. ONAN CORP.

No. IP 97-0814-C-H/G.

117 F.Supp.2d 812 (2000)

James EATON and Steve Seidlitz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ONAN CORPORATION, The Pension Policy Committee of Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Onan Pension Plan, and Onan Profit Sharing Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

September 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Barnard, Sommer & Barnard, Indianapolis, IN.

William K. Carr, Denver, CO.

Robert F. Hill, Hill & Robbins, Denver, CO.

Arthur P. Kalleres & Marc Sciscoe, Ice Miller, Indianapolis, IN.

ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Like many employers in recent years, defendant Onan Corporation converted its defined benefit retirement plan to a design known as a "cash balance" design. In this case, Onan employees and retirees have raised a claim of age discrimination that could result in a finding that cash balance plans are essentially per se illegal. The question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases