Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the petitioner personally.
As the Surrogate's Court properly noted, the petitioner failed to submit legally admissible evidence to support his claim that the marriage at issue was bigamous (see, CPLR 4521, 4540 [c]), and failed to rebut the strong presumption favoring the validity of that marriage (see, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v Jackson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.