1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 106 F.Supp.2d
  5. 106 F.Supp.2d 667 (2000)
 

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC. v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.

No. CIV. 96-4047(HAA).

106 F.Supp.2d 667 (2000)

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and Schering Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer Gordon, Jonathan A. Marshall, Scott D. Stimpson, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Sidney David, Paul H. Konchanski, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, Westfield, NJ, for Defendants.

OPINION

ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Schering's defense of inequitable conduct in the above-referenced case. This Court severed the defense of inequitable conduct from Boehringer's claim of infringement and Schering's defense of obviousness. On January 20, 2000 a jury found the Boehringer had proven infringement by a preponderance of the evidence and that Schering had failed to demonstrate that the 5,476,778 Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases