1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 92 F.Supp.2d
  5. 92 F.Supp.2d 680 (2000)
 

BOLER CO. v. NEWAY ANCHORLOCK, INC.

No. 5:99-CV-1934.

92 F.Supp.2d 680 (2000)

THE BOLER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NEWAY ANCHORLOCK, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

April 11, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Drechsler, David P. Dureska, Buckingham, John B. Schomer, Karen K. Grasso, Mark J. Skakun, Walter A. Lucas, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP, Akron, OH, for Boler Co., Plaintiff.

George T. Williams, John E. McGarry, Michael F. Kelly, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, Grand Rapids, MI, Glenn E. Forbis, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, Bloomfield Hills, MI, John C. Fairweather, Brouse & McDowell, Akron, OH, John W. Solomon, Brouse & McDowell, Akron, OH, for Neway Anchorlok Intern., Inc., Defendant.

JUDGEMENT

GWIN, District Judge.

On March 6, 2000, Plaintiff The Boler Company ("Boler") moved this Court for summary judgment as to its claim that Defendant Neway Anchorlok International Inc. ("Neway") infringed claim 16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,366,237 (" '237 patent"), owned by Boler [Doc. 65]. On that same date, Neway filed a motion for summary judgment as to its defenses that it does not infringe the '237 patent and its counterclaim that the '237 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases