1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 5 P.3d
  5. 5 P.3d 767 (2000)
 

SCHULTZ v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY

No. 45015-8-I.

5 P.3d 767 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 693

Ronald SCHULTZ, a married man, in his capacity as a single man, Appellant, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 7, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilmar Henson Williamson, Ross Williamson Loitz PLLC, Shawn G. Hart, Seattle, for Appellant.

Ruth A.R. Robinson, Duana Theresa Kolouskova, Snohomish County Prosc. Atty., Everett, for Respondent.

AGID, C.J.

Ronald Schultz contends that by using a two-step process not defined in the Snohomish County Code (SCC), Planning and Development Services (PDS) violated his right to receive a written decision on his short subdivision application within 30 days of its submittal under SCC 20.20.030 and effectuated a taking when it determined his application was required to provide for dedication of a public road. We conclude that the SCC does set forth a two-step process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases