1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 277 A.D.2d
  5. 277 A.D.2d 450 (2000)
 

ZAFONTE v. STEINHAMMER

277 A.D.2d 450 (2000)

715 N.Y.S.2d 896

NICOLE ZAFONTE, Appellant, v. ROBERT STEINHAMMER, Defendant, and ALEJANDRO ROMAN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 27, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's sole contention on appeal is that the Supreme Court erred in failing to grant her an extension of time to serve the respondents in the interest of justice pursuant to CPLR 306-b. However, her argument, raised for the first time on appeal, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Fleet Bank v Powerhouse Trading Corp., 267 A.D.2d 276, 277; Dufficy v Wharf Bar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases