1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 90 F.Supp.2d
  5. 90 F.Supp.2d 631 (2000)
 

ZEMAITATIS v. INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.

Civil Action No. 98-1221.

90 F.Supp.2d 631 (2000)

Scott ZEMAITATIS And Stephen Zemaitatis v. INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 17, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Lauricella, Benedict A. Casey, Beasley, Casey and Erbstein, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

L. Rostaing Tharaud, Marshall, Demmehey, Warner, Coleman and Goggin, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas A. Brophy, Gordon B. Simmons, Marshall, Demmehey, Warner, Coleman and Goggin, Norristown, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAPIRO, Senior District Judge.

A jury found by a preponderance of the evidence that a defectively designed product of defendant Innovasive Devices, Inc. ("Innovasive") was a substantial factor in causing harm suffered by plaintiff, Scott Zemaitatis. The verdict awarded Zemaitatis was $47,000 in medical expenses and $250,000 for pain and suffering. Innovasive, moving for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and/or remittitur...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases