The court's verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The court properly rejected defendant's agency defense, since the evidence established that defendant acted primarily for his own benefit in negotiating and promoting the sale, and that the benefit he received cannot be described as incidental (see, People v Lam Lek Chong,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.