Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. Defendant's present arguments are unpreserved for appellate review because he raised completely different arguments before the hearing court, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the spontaneous identification resulting from the viewing of defendant in a cell at Rikers Island by one of the victims, a fellow inmate, was not subject...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.