The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence clearly establishes a forcible taking while aided by other persons actually present (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]).
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request to receive in evidence the report of the complainant's 911 call, since the inconsistency it contained was elicited by defendant during...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.