1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 604 N.W.2d
  5. 604 N.W.2d 91 (2000)
 

NODAK MUT. INS. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT.

No. C3-98-1792.

604 N.W.2d 91 (2000)

NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, Appellant, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 13, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Harrie, Niles, Hansen & Davies, Ltd., Fargo, ND, for appellant.

Paul R. Aamodt, Aamodt & Lamb, Fargo, ND, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

This case raises the question of whether Minnesota's or North Dakota's no-fault law applies when a Minnesota resident covered by a Minnesota automobile insurance policy is injured in an automobile accident in North Dakota by a North Dakota resident covered by a North Dakota policy. We hold that when all other relevant choice-of-law factors favor neither state's law, the state where the accident occurred has the strongest governmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases