Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the first degree and acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was repugnant or inconsistent is not preserved for appellate review as no objection was raised before the jury was discharged (see, People v Satloff,
In addition, the verdict was not against the weight...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.