1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 277 A.D.2d
  5. 277 A.D.2d 381 (2000)
 

MATTER OF HANLEY v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM

277 A.D.2d 381 (2000)

716 N.Y.S.2d 327

In the Matter of KERI A. HANLEY, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 20, 2000.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

To annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must determine that the record lacks substantial evidence (see, Matter of McQueeney v Dutchess County Sheriff, 223 A.D.2d 710). "[A]n administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence when the evidence consists of `such relevant proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases