CRIM. DEFENSE LAWYERS v. KAYE


95 N.Y.2d 556 (2000)

744 N.E.2d 123

721 N.Y.S.2d 588

In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS et al., Appellants, v. JUDITH S. KAYE, as Chief Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 21, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City (Julia Tarver of counsel), for appellants.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Alicia Ouellette of counsel), for respondents.

Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT concur in Per Curiam opinion; Chief Judge KAYE taking no part.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The issue presented is whether Chief Judge Kaye1 and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley, named as parties in this CPLR article 78 proceeding brought to invalidate an administrative order of the Court, should be disqualified from participating in the decision of petitioners' motion for leave to appeal from an order affirming the dismissal of the proceeding.2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases