The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence clearly warranted the conclusion that defendant was acting as a lookout, in that he was observed on a deserted street in the early morning hours, looking in all directions while a second individual was removing an ignition from a nearby parked car. Furthermore, defendant was heard to whistle as a livery cab driver approached, which action resulted in defendant's accomplice exiting the vandalized...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.