Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the court improperly precluded him from asking the undercover officer his name is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.