1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 107 F.Supp.2d
  5. 107 F.Supp.2d 489 (2000)
 

C.R. BARD, INC. v. U.S. SURGICAL CORP.

No. Civ.A. 99-286-RRM.

107 F.Supp.2d 489 (2000)

C.R. BARD, INC., and Davol Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 4, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Maryellen Noreika, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware, Peter B. Ellis, Claire Laporte, Sarah Cooleybeck, John Nilsson, Foley, Hoag & Eliot, LLP, Boston, MA, for plaintiffs.

Andre G. Bouchard, Joel Friedlander, Bouchard Margules & Friedlander, Wilmington, Delaware, Eric J. Lobenfeld, Drew M. Wintringham, Michael R. Graif, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York City, for defendant.

AMENDED OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Plaintiff C.R. Bard, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Murray Hill, New Jersey. Bard owns U.S.Patent No. 5,356,432, as reexamined ("the '432 patent"). Plaintiff Davol Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bard, is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Cranston, Rhode Island. Davol markets and sells products that practice the '432...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases