1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 81 F.Supp.2d
  5. 81 F.Supp.2d 506 (2000)
 

PAREX BANK v. RUSSIAN SAV. BANK

No. 99 Civ. 8760(RWS).

81 F.Supp.2d 506 (2000)

PAREX BANK, Plaintiff, v. RUSSIAN SAVINGS BANK a/k/a Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Russian Federation Savings Bank of the Russian Federation a/k/a Sberbank, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Verner Simon, New York City by Paul W. Verner, of counsel, for Plaintiff.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City by Howard S. Zelbo, Joseph T. Dixon, of counsel, for Defendant.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Parex Bank ("Parex") has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to remand this action to New York State Supreme Court, New York County. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Background and Prior Proceedings

On July 21, 1999, Parex, a Latvian bank which does business in New York, filed this action in New York Supreme Court against Russian Savings Bank a/k/a Savings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases