1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 84 F.Supp.2d
  5. 84 F.Supp.2d 492 (2000)
 

CONBOY v. AT & T CORP.

No. 99 Civ. 0360(RJW).

84 F.Supp.2d 492 (2000)

Edward J. CONBOY, Eileen M. Conboy Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. AT & T CORP., and AT & T Universal Card Services Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 4, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rossbacher & Associates, Los Angeles, CA by Henry H. Rossbacher, James S. Cahill, Clara I. Duran Reed, of counsel, Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, NY by Daniel T. Hughes, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

T. Jay Thompson, Basking Ridge, NJ, for defendant AT & T Corp.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York by George A. Zimmerman, of counsel, for defendant AT & T Universal Card Services, Corp.

OPINION

WARD, District Judge.

Defendants each move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiffs' Class Action First Amended Complaint (hereinafter "complaint") for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, defendants' motions are granted and the complaint is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Edward and Eileen Conboy bring this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases