Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment. The proof submitted on the motion showed, inter alia, the existence of a factual question as to whether the appellant was responsible, at least in part, for the complained-of condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff's injuries (see generally, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.