PATTEN v. CITY OF NEW YORK


277 A.D.2d 296 (2000)

715 N.Y.S.2d 670

CELIA D. PATTEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. NEW YORK PAVING, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTING METHODS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 13, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment. The proof submitted on the motion showed, inter alia, the existence of a factual question as to whether the appellant was responsible, at least in part, for the complained-of condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff's injuries (see generally, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases