The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the inference of accessorial liability with respect to each of the charges. Specifically, the evidence establishes that appellant's act of kicking the complainant was for the purpose of assisting in the robbery (see, Matter of Juan J.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.