1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 119 F.Supp.2d
  5. 119 F.Supp.2d 433 (2000)
 

INVIVO RESEARCH, INC. v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE EQUIPMENT CORP.

No. 99 Civ. 11863 (RWS).

119 F.Supp.2d 433 (2000)

INVIVO RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and Medrad, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hopgood, Calimafde, Judlowe & Mondolino, New York City (John M. Calimafde, David Garrod, of Counsel), for Plaintiff.

Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, New York City (Scott S. McKessy, of Counsel), for Defendant Medrad, Inc.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The defendants Magnetic Resonance Equipment Corporation ("MRE") and Medrad, Inc. ("Medrad") have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) for an order transferring this patent infringement action to the Western District of Pennsylvania where a declaratory judgment action raising identical issues is pending. Plaintiff Invivo Research, Inc. ("Invivo") opposes the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases