The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant's participation in the sale was established by evidence that after the undercover officer offered to buy drugs, appellant responded affirmatively to his companion's question as to whether "we" had crack, that the two left the officer and entered and exited a building together, and that shortly after the companion consummated the sale, the two were apprehended...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.