1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 110 F.Supp.2d
  5. 110 F.Supp.2d 420 (2000)
 

HARRODS LTD. v. SIXTY INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES

No. Civ.A. 00-262-A.

110 F.Supp.2d 420 (2000)

HARRODS LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. SIXTY INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

August 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey J. Greeves, Greenberg Traurig, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Attison L. Barnes, III, Gardner, Carton & Douglas, Washington, DC, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRINKEMA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, raising an unprecedented question as to the pleading requirements for an in rem action under the newly enacted Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act ("ACPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1125. Because we agree with defendants that bad faith is an element of an in rem action under the ACPA, we will grant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases